Current:Home > FinanceCan Mississippi permanently strip felons of voting rights? 19 federal judges will hear the case -Secure Growth Solutions
Can Mississippi permanently strip felons of voting rights? 19 federal judges will hear the case
View
Date:2025-04-17 23:38:56
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Nineteen federal appellate judges are scheduled to hear arguments Tuesday on whether Mississippi can continue to permanently strip voting rights from people convicted of certain felonies, including nonviolent crimes for which they have served a complete sentence.
The outcome of the case will likely determine whether tens of thousands of people win back the right to vote. An immediate decision is not expected.
Criminal justice advocates won a major victory last August when a three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the ban violates the Constitution’s prohibition against “cruel and unusual” punishment. But the full 17-member circuit court vacated that ruling weeks later and scheduled Tuesday’s hearing.
Attorneys for the state argue that the voting ban is a “nonpunitive voting regulation” and that, even if it did constitute punishment, it isn’t cruel and unusual.
The court’s 17 full-time active judges are expected to hear arguments, along with two senior-status part-time judges who sat on the panel that ruled against the ban in August.
Under the Mississippi Constitution, people convicted of 10 specific felonies, including bribery, theft and arson, lose the right to vote. Under a previous state attorney general, the list was expanded to 22 crimes, including timber larceny and carjacking.
To have their voting rights restored, people convicted of any of the crimes must get a pardon from the governor or persuade lawmakers to pass individual bills just for them with two-thirds approval. Lawmakers in recent years have passed few of those bills, and they passed none in 2023.
“Mississippi stands as an outlier among its sister states, bucking a clear and consistent trend in our Nation against permanent disenfranchisement,” Senior Judge James Dennis wrote in the August opinion, joined by Senior Judge Carolyn Dineen King. Both judges were nominated to the court by Democratic presidents — King by Jimmy Carter and Dennis by Bill Clinton.
Also on the panel was Judge Edith Jones, still on full-time status nearly 40 years after she was nominated to the court by Republican President Ronald Reagan. In a dissent to the August ruling, Jones cited a previous Supreme Court ruling regarding felons’ disenfranchisement, saying it is up to legislatures to decide such matters.
Tuesday’s hearing will include Jones and 16 other full-time members of the court. King and Dennis will also take part because they were members of the original ruling panel. The 5th Circuit is one of the most conservative circuit appeals courts, with 12 of its full-time posts filled by nominees of Republican presidents.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- All That You Wanted to Know About She’s All That
- Nikki Haley rejects third-party No Labels presidential bid, says she wouldn't be able to work with a Democratic VP
- RHOSLC’s Heather Gay Admits Ozempic Use Made Her Realize Body Positivity Was a Lie
- MLB's few remaining iron men defy load management mandates: 'Why would I not be playing?'
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Medical groups urge Alabama Supreme Court to revisit frozen embryo ruling
- Resist Booksellers vows to 'inspire thinkers to go out in the world and leave their mark'
- Voucher expansion leads to more students, waitlists and classes for some religious schools
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Cancer is no longer a death sentence, but treatments still have a long way to go
Ranking
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Suspected drunk driver charged with killing bride on wedding night released on bail
- IRS special agent accused of involuntary manslaughter in shooting of fellow employee at gun range
- What is a 'boy mom' and why is it cringey? The social media term explained
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Where are people under the most financial stress? See the list of top 10 American cities
- 2 police horses on the lam cause traffic jam on I-90 in Cleveland area
- What is a 'boy mom' and why is it cringey? The social media term explained
Recommendation
'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
NPR puzzlemaster Will Shortz says he is recovering from a stroke
Black women struggle to find their way in a job world where diversity is under attack
Justin Timberlake Shares Rare Family Photos in Sweet 42nd Birthday Tribute to Jessica Biel
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Inside the story of the notorious Menendez brothers case
NASCAR Las Vegas race March 2024: Start time, TV, streaming, lineup for Pennzoil 400
Millions of Americans are family caregivers. A nationwide support group aims to help them